The National Assembly session which questioned the Minister of Energy and Petroleum, left me very worried more by the actions of the parliamentary opposition and least for the lies of the Minister, which was expected (this regime could not survive if they tell the truth). He fell into the trap of allowing the agenda to be deflected into a Byzantine discussion scheduled on whether to disregard for the Armed Forces (FAN) for not attending opposition to the Angostura session in protest to the General Rangel Silva speaker. We attempted to separate a General condemns the censorship of the institution. You can not. We must reclaim the FAN has not taken disciplinary action against the officer who threatened democracy. So for me, the most serious is that he is still subject to the military as if they were the arbiters of our future. We assume that are beyond reproach and that the ruling and opposition compete in show submission. In countries where military power is subordinate, indeed, the civil power that General had been removed. The opposition had to be postponed for another stronger responses during the FAN, making it clear that those who are disrespectful officers who act outside the Constitution in open violation of the essence of democracy.
The second thing that bothered me was the negative charge that the ruling put to words like Fedecámaras, meritocracy, the private sector. In the business world they are an obstacle to overcome, the private sector and privatization, bad words to be eliminated language and meritocracy in a scheme to deceive the unwary. We must be convinced that without a productive private sector, investors, managers, efficient and modern unions will not progress. One need only look at the successful countries today as China, Singapore, Brazil, Chile, South Korea, who have been to stimulate the private sector and bury the myths of outdated educational systems like ours. What really worries is the lack of a position of our members. Why no one stands up and says, I do support Fedecámaras? Why when a company confiscated the majority opposes claiming to defend jobs, but few express their direct support to owners and management? Why when he criticizes the failure of nationalized companies condemned the inefficiency of the system administrator, but it says that the private sector was more efficient and that a new government will have to re-privatize I seized and much more? Why no one remembers the Minister Ramírez to his diatribe on the old PDVSA and the disqualification of the Apertura, this process he left the country 600,000 barrels a day (b / d) of new production in the Orinoco Belt and 500,000 b / d in the Operating Agreements, that the communist regime has not produced a single barrel again and that all PDVSA Business Plans have been grossly violated? Is it possible that many of our opposition is still statist at heart? If so, the problem is us and ... Chavez.
Our parliamentarians have to organize better and to act in line cross-examine the questioned, in addition to each member his own question if I had time. The most important thing: we must not allow the FAN is taboo and that privatization and trade unions become devalued words for unacceptable wear their importance.
0 comments:
Post a Comment