One of the reasons why some analysts doubt that Chavez delivered the presidency, even losing the 2012 elections, is the international nature of its political project . Should not be fooled, the tentacles of the revolution originated in Cuba and its objectives are offshore Fidel Castro: a Latin answer to his political thinking. These governments manipulate the Constitution to remain in power because changing the institutional foundations of representative democracy takes time. The model is 50 years of Fidel Castro in Cuba. Another goal is the state control over all institutions, with a frontage that allows advances and setbacks in its strategy but never return to the starting point. This is important to understand, on the way to the institutional destruction no real setbacks, only pauses for a new momentum. No recognition errors are corrected only rushing. Two elements
are critical for this destruction: education and private property. Education which, like it or not, in all societies respond to a given ideology is submitted to the Thought of the regime. To do so perverts the story, is militarized to students, teachers are ideologized and threatening to parents and guardians to declare them enemies of the regime. A higher education is denied resources to weaken as it creates another massively parallel system, without selectivity for income and without quality, which is sold as the "democratization" of the system.
In the first attack private property confiscated estates to the productive sector and industries to create socialist enterprises and farms, whose product, if any, alleged to be sold at lower prices. The next step is the attack on personal property, houses and small family businesses, arguing that some people have too many big houses that can accommodate other families. We're not there yet, but ... The international nature of the process has already had some successes and there is a risk that the recent elections in Peru, emergence of a new partner for the revolution in the block including Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia leaving alone among the Andean countries Colombia, Bolivarian holder of a real democracy. Indeed, Ollanta Humala, despite your new address, is a real danger for democracy in the region. Ms. Fujimori is a danger of another nature. Autocratic tendencies also may have inherited genes from his father, but not see it as a member of the Cuban project. Hopefully these two Peruvian people select the one that represents the lowest risk for the region.
this international project must be stopped within each country before communicating vessels of interest between them get to the point of no return so much to lose. To the people there to explain the foundations of a political strategy that takes advantage of some shortcomings of the democratic system to build a dictatorial autocracy que nivela por abajo, elimina las libertades individuales, pervierte las mentes de sus hijos, convierte a cada ciudadano en un delator y que todos esos resultados negativos se hacen en nombre de una promesa de bienestar que no llega nunca y de un esfuerzo por eliminar la pobreza y la desigualdad que resulta en una perversa sumisión colectiva a los caprichos del dictador.
0 comments:
Post a Comment