A bad words for the ruling: Fedecámaras, meritocracy, private, mentioned in my last article I add today the most important and competitive capitalism. Behind
contempt for the words lies a tremendous ignorance of what the twenty-first century these words represent. In fact capitalism and socialism battered loved are no longer two opposite sides of the same coin. In successful countries and capitalism is "savage" or socialism is "progressive." In today's world and have missing right and left as definitions of a political position and the defects and virtues attributed to him yesterday, have merged to reflect the best of the old differences, and the new strategy of the developed world has accepted capitalism as an economic model together of socialism as a social model. Nor is it novel. The Nordic countries (Sweden, Norway, Denmark) have years of that. Today self-styled socialist nations have a capitalist economy that encourages investment, encourages the private sector, promotes competition and, at the same time, develop social programs for the entire population. Successfully combat poverty and exclusion. Break the old educational schemes to promote creativity and using modern communication tools. Another important aspect of this model is that it seems to be successful under different political systems. Brazil and Chile in a democracy, although in the latter the change started, sorry to say, with Pinochet. In China, communism as a political expression is merged with a capitalist economic model. Something that the old comrades of the Soviet Union would never have accepted as possible. We believe that the new model requires democracy to flourish. So we hope that in so far as absolutist governments will meet the basic needs of its citizens and eliminate poverty and exclusion then require people to live under higher values \u200b\u200bas freedom and claim less authoritarian forms of government (China is the pilot).
If the leaders of the ruling party took the time to observe the world around them rather than navel-gazing introspection in total, would see that the planet is not a single company which has entered the modern, under a communist model that so I must call the capricious system we have today. What is already developed societies have understood is that what really creates development is investment, government and private sector together, competitiveness and modern education. And raw materials and the state as exclusive player economic act are no longer applicable. They were buried in the collapse of the Soviet Union, North Korea, Cuba and the last 12 years in Venezuela. Only here do not see the ruling party and opposition will weigh more than 50 years of statism that were accompanied by a dismissive of the private language of entrepreneurs and competition. Education reflected these negativities and left us today so punished, yet we assume embarrassed.
why Chavez has been able to defend the indefensible. We have left him alone with his lies. And so easy that would refute it if we were not afraid to publicly identify with the words devalued, the ransom and we put to circulate among the population in anticipation of a new government that will have to use them extensively.
0 comments:
Post a Comment