TRANSITION IN TWO CANDIDATES ONE
I have the impression that the bed of the opposition in the NA does not meet the expectations raised his electoral triumph. Here are some aspects that I think could be improved. 1. It requires a coordinator of the opposition. With different political groups, each with its coordinator, it is difficult to act expeditiously if we all have to be consulted before reacting. 2. Topics must be assigned to Members act according to their knowledge on the subject to discuss and have no participation of parties in pre-assigned order. 3. Members have to defend, without hesitation, democracy, capitalism and private property. 4. Since the government majority does not allow the opposition to pass laws, conduct that is also reflected in the work of the committees, it is important that our members come to the Press to report on his proposals. When abuse is intolerable official in torpedoing our action must leave the session and inform the media. In short, look for actions that enhance our presence and efforts within the AN. Having achieved a significant number of deputies must be noticed to the public. Do not be overwhelm or silence by most undeserved and circumstantial.
II. scenarios
We must prepare strategic responses to various scenarios What if for some unforeseen event suspending Primaries? Understand that the more distant are more likely to "something" might happen. This scenario of a suspension is related to the political scene there is no presidential election. Take this opportunity within a broader context. Chavez may be substituted in different ways. The election is one of them but also scenario there waiver for various reasons ranging from health to a social explosion. Other scenarios include death, dismissal by the Supreme Court or military coup. I understand that the Chavez none of the above is considered, but the opposition can not only prepare for the electoral scenario is highly desirable. Determinism policy that bets on a single scenario usually results when the ideal is not the case, a "dog eat dog" of those who by their foresight, were bare of solutions (Remember the recall)
Much
said that we must prepare for "the day after, but is concern usually relates to the time when an election result by Chávez to deliver the presidency. But the "day after" may come earlier, under the scenarios mentioned here. From a strategic standpoint is suicidal to prepare for a single stage with a single result. Someone (some) should start thinking about alternative scenarios electoral determinism. Someone should design activities for themselves, for example, even within the electoral arena, win, win and not give us, we lose or lose visible fraud (such as maintaining, in this case, the fighting spirit not resign ourselves to submit without protest to the excesses of the regime) and, of course, how to react to the other scenarios Elementary suspension and / or election, resignation, death or coup.
The worst that can happen to us as a country is that it becomes predictable surprise which we have no answer and move from a makeshift government to another of the same features.
